Search results

And Mo Wagner

Lol

Luol Deng

Lol

Does this include Randles’s cap gold? And what is his cap hold?

Is anybody really gonna offer more than the Lakers would this off-season given that Kawhi is adamant he will be a Laker next year? Cause I doubt it. I’m not saying they’ll be able to get Kawhi without giving up BI, but they won’t have to give up Kuz or Lonzo now. They probably settle on...

Both of these posts are accurate

Ok yea it would take more salary but they could give up one of Ingram/Lonzo instead of both or whatever it is the Spurs would require now. And why would the Spurs let him leave for nothing when they can get some actual assets out of it? That would be gross mismanagement.    Either way, it...

https://twitter.com/lakerfilmroom/status/1013596547303419904?s=21   Hows that for leverage?

Trolling. I said the same thing to my Kobe Stan/Laker fan friend

https://twitter.com/ramonashelburne/status/1013593567602733057?s=21

If Kawhi is a free agent it will take substantially less to trade for him via S&T than it would to get him now

https://twitter.com/ramonashelburne/status/1013593567602733057?s=21   Like I said, no pressure on the Lakers to trade for Kawhi

If the end goal is to trade for him it doesn’t matter if it’s before/after Randle signs a sheet. Also if it’s true that Randle doesn’t want to be there he might just take the QO

He’s signed for 3 years with no guarantee of Kawhi, there’s no pressure for the FO to give up the farm to get him

Cuss if you can wait a year and keep BI and one of Lonzo/Kuzma it’s probably worth it. Spurs won’t get nearly as much in a S&T as they would if they moved him now

How? Spurs were holding out that the Lakers would trade him to attract LeBron, Bron is a Laker now regardless of whether or not they get Kawhi

The fuck do the Lakers need him for? They got LeBron locked up for 3 years, they can wait a year and sign him for nothing

Spurs lose quite a bit of leverage with Bron announcing before Kawhi is traded

Greatest Laker ever