Basically teams only need to be loyal when it’s beneficial to them, which isn’t really loyalty at all. But players need to be loyal all the time whether or not it benefits them
Any strain is technically a tear no matter how severe it is. Could have been a pretty minor tear that he felt was just discomfort.
Edit: Strain not Sprain
At no point during the season, especially that late, should he have ever been ahead of Harden.
24-5-4 aren't MVP numbers for a team that improved by all of 2 wins
At the 3 minute mark of the 4th quarter they add 7 points to the leading teams score, first team to hit that wins. It’s an interesting and creative idea that solves a few late game issues but also presents it’s own.
Heres Zach Lowe on the idea...
Is it really that bad of a trade if Atlanta was doing everything they could to dump Shroeder? Great trade for OKC, sure, but ATL doesn’t do this unless they just want to get rid of Shroeder
Toronto is easily the second best team in the East, and can be pretty close to Boston if Kawhi is back to 2017 levels (kinda depends on coaching).
And I don't know how you can possible say they don't have enough offensive firepower when they had the third best offense in the league last year...
The idea that loyalty only applies to franchise players is hilarious, just goes to show that loyalty doesn’t actually exist. Either it applies to everyone or no one