I wouldn't have said "One game records tell the whole story? Lol, keep going, I beg you" if that was never in there. Whatever, though, this whole thing is ridiculous.
I posted "One game records tell the whole story? Lol, keep going, I beg you" right after your post.
You took it out. Say what you want, but I wouldn't have made my post had you not said that. Simple as that.
Lol, oh really?
And if you could read, you would realize that I don't have a problem with you thinking the Jags are better than the Falcons. It's the fact that you think a one game record proves that. Do some research on variables. It will help you.
Lol, nice try. You clearly said at the beginning that one game tells the whole story. You probably realized how stupid that was and edited it. Sneaky, sneaky you.
You said team a is better than team b because team a has the better record. That's what I'm getting at.
That's not true. I'm not saying team a can't be better, but having the better record after just one week doesn't automatically make them better...even RIGHT NOW. There's a thing called variables.
That's where the problem is.
It isn't even the fact that you think the Jags are better than the Falcons, it's the fact that you think that because of their record after just one game. Having the better record after one game doesn't mean you are the better team, it's just means you have a better...