alright, that's fine it just seems weird to me since the min wouldn't have changed until 14-15 IRL.
if Hill is stuck at 2 years that's fine I guess, but since it's more than he signed for is it fair to change him to a 3 year deal like he had originally if the last year is the min for that year?
do what you must, it's not a big deal but to be fair it's quite confusing which rules we go by since there seems to be a little picking and choosing on the salary mins
would it be okay to change his contract to the 3 years i offered but 490k then 816k then 947k if thats how its gotta be? cause hill's second year that i'm apparently allowed to keep at 500k is also below this lol. so i'm quite confused what exactly is the rule here
yeah but that's after the CBA is changed. do you get what I'm saying? before the CBA change and cap jump, the min was 490K. so as long as you have the cap space to offer that on a multi year deal with the increase, it's technically not the same as a MIN where you're over cap and therefore only...
didn't realize we went off of this. also, since the CBA wasn't changed retroactively, isn't anything above the current min on an increase still allowed after the change?
so $490,180 would be the min for a rookie in the current season. seems like if it was $500,000 per year on an increase that...
hm, since when? i was under the impression the min for 0 years experience was like $332,000 or something. so what's the min for the third year? cause by definition, if the third year min is $540,850 then as long as the third year is there or above it's not a min contract.
I'm not gonna argue...
how come? I realize the offer i sent originally was wrong since it was 500k for 3 years no increase, and his third year was gonna be under the min. but the whole point was to give him a deal so i had 3 birds when he was done...
so yeah it was my fault on the offer but can it be increased to...