- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Messages
- 67,842
- Reaction score
- 2,208
The risk was about to be minimized once they traded Bynum for Dwight Howard
the trade would have saved the lakers moneyI'd say that's pretty irrelevant because I'm sure most of the owners who would benefit would want the Lakers to pay that tax.
Like the Yankees/Red Sox in baseball
why does he mention it specifically?Gilbert is about to open multiple casinos in Ohio and watch as his cash flows in.. The dude basically runs downtown Cleveland and he's only getting bigger. The guy does not care about losing pocket change via NBA luxury tax.
The whole point of it is, is helping other small market teams.. After one more draft or two and the Cavs start to get competitive, they won't be receiving tax payer money, they'll be one of the teams giving up money, so I don't see how he comes off as greedy. Like I said, he's been a tax payer his entire tenure.why does he mention it specifically?
he comes across as greedy
he doesnt even mention the other teams in the trade
Probably cause you overvalue your players.i understand why you guys dont like the trade
you all hate the lakers. it's cool
but no one did anything unfair here. nothing illegal
this should not have been vetoed
how the hell does the nba let melo force his way to ny, let the heat and celtics do their thing, and then veto this
wow im still furious
what?Probably cause you overvalue your players.
Pau is soft as cake and doesn't help the Hornets what so ever.what?
is pau not a top 5 PF? maybe top 3 or 2?
is odom not the best 6th man?
like it or not, he's a fringe all-star talent. he can do everything on the court