- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Messages
- 36,768
- Reaction score
- 1,153
Welker is better right now, Calvin is #2The guy is probably the best wide receiver in the game right now
Welker is better right now, Calvin is #2The guy is probably the best wide receiver in the game right now
Not even trying to bait..but you do realize that answer can be said for Fitz/Andre too right?Runs his routes well, fast, can outjump any CB by a couple feet, catches basically anything that comes his way.
I mean, what type of answer are you looking for here?
Watch some Lions games, see the catches he makes.
Who cares... Calvin Johnson is a stud, I don't care if he's considered #1, #2, #3, #4, #50, #60.. The guy is a beast and nobody would complain if he played for their respective team. You can't go wrong with any of the three - Calvin, Andre, Fitzgerald.Not even trying to bait..but you do realize that answer can be said for Fitz/Andre too right?
You say this every time someone argues about the top players at a certain position.Who cares... Calvin Johnson is a stud, I don't care if he's considered #1, #2, #3, #4, #50, #60.. The guy is a beast and nobody would complain if he played for their respective team. You can't go wrong with any of the three - Calvin, Andre, Fitzgerald.
Exactly, so why is he considered worst than the two.Not even trying to bait..but you do realize that answer can be said for Fitz/Andre too right?
Andre does it better than them all.Exactly, so why is he considered worst than the two.
To me, it's just opinionated who is #1. You can't go wrong with any 3..
You still havent presented a reason why you believe hes better than the two.You are entitled to your own opinion.
no, there isnt a wrong answer lolAndre does it better than them all.
Fitz and Calvin is near the same, except Fitz is better at going up and getting the ball and getting seperation.
Therefore.
Andre > > Fitz > Calvin.
Its understood that Calvin is a Lion, and you have some favoritism there.. but there is a "wrong answer".. Its not like all 3 are the same players.
This sounds like a much better thread.When I first saw this thread on the forum tho.. I thought it said "Matthew Stafford Takes A Shit"
But MJD is better though.. Hes the better all around player. Catches, Runs, Fast, Block, ETC.no, there isnt a wrong answer lol
if he was titans fan, and saying Britt is a top reciever, then yes thats wrong
But Calvin is just as good as the 2 ahead of him
But using your logic, i can say
Peterson>> Cj28>MJD
but you would argue that, as "Jones-Drew is an equal or better RB than those 2". How is that different than Rip and inf saying Calvin is equal to Andre/Fitz?
Because by fucking watching them, you can just fucking tell whos better.Like what fucking fact are you basing your ideas off of?
You said Andre does it better? Is there some statistical fact or algorithm that claims that, or is that just kam's "I know everything so it's true" stat?
Cause you can say Andre is better at everything all you want, but at the end of the day that is your own damn opinion.
But I do?It's clear you don't watch the Lions.
I've watched the Lions.. Im not saying Calvin isn't good.. hes top 3.. but hes just not better than Andre nor Fitz.If you watched the Lions it would be just as clear to you that he is just as good.
I don't know what Lions you are watching. Nittany Lions or something?
You telling me MJD is faster than Johnson? lmao.But MJD is better though.. Hes the better all around player. Catches, Runs, Fast, Block, ETC.
AP > MJD.But MJD is better though.. Hes the better all around player. Catches, Runs, Fast, Block, ETC.