- Joined
- Jan 22, 2006
- Messages
- 88,197
- Reaction score
- 730
It means he was a top DT.
He is only getting better.
He is only getting better.
So in 2009, was David Garrard the best QB?It means he was a top DT.
He is only getting better.
How do you know that?No.
And Suh isn't Jairus Byrd.
That doesnt have anything to do with it.Cause Suh was considered the best DT prospect, like ever.
Byrd was a second round pick lol.
Who knows if hes a finished product? Thats all i've been saying. To anybody who thinks hes the best, anything.He's still learning the game. To have the season he had, and knowing he is going to only get better.
If you think he's a finished product....
I never said Gabbert would even be good, nor am I claiming him to be the greatest QB prospect ever.I think you can when dude was like one of the greatest DT prospects ever lol.
He isn't going to stay dormant in his skill set.
There is no facts to prove that, but how do you know Gabbert will be good? Same thing.
I didn't say you did, it was a rhetorical question.I never said Gabbert would even be good, nor am I claiming him to be the greatest QB prospect ever.
I know that Gabbert could bust.
& Cortez Kennedy.Russell Maryland >
You do know that its uncommon for a DT to even get like 10 sacks.I expect a better year. Another pro bowl. 12 sacks.
This. Most are known for run stopping not sacking that is DE's and Rushing OLB's.You do know that its uncommon for a DT to even get like 10 sacks.
No its notNah, it's fairly common for a talented 3-tech to get around 10 sacks. Especially in todays game.
So only SUH getting 10 sacks and no other DT getting 10 is common. Sweet.Nah, it's fairly common for a talented 3-tech to get around 10 sacks. Especially in todays game.