Vikings Meeting with LA about relocation.

Status
Not open for further replies.

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Vikings owner Zygi Wilf reportedly met Tuesday with LA Live!'s Tim Leiweke and the AEG team that is considering an NFL stadium in Los Angeles.
Due to an unresolved $5 billion budget deficit, the final $300 million in state contribution for an Arden Hills Vikings stadium has been held up in the Minnesota state legislature. Wilf's franchise is essentially a free agent after the 2011 season, and it looks like he's at least willing to listen to the AEG team in case a deal can't be reached on a new stadium in Minnesota.
UH OH!
 

.infamous

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
771
INB4SEVENOHONESAYSTHISAINTTRUE!

Just playing 701 lol. But yeah I saw this coming first the lakers now this lol.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Ponder about to carry Minnesota on their back to a SUPABOWL.
 

.infamous

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
771
Naw he is gonna be carrying the team to LA imo lol
 

lakerfan

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
16,962
Reaction score
12
Simply put, a team in Los Angeles is a near impossibility in the forseeable future. There is no political leadership calling for a stadium, no financing plan to build one, and no location to put one in. And most importantly, given the economic condition of the city, no one is willing to touch this issue with a ten foot pole.

Minnesota, your team is safe.
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
Simply put, a team in Los Angeles is a near impossibility in the forseeable future. There is no political leadership calling for a stadium, no financing plan to build one, and no location to put one in. And most importantly, given the economic condition of the city, no one is willing to touch this issue with a ten foot pole.

Minnesota, your team is safe.
They already have a company willing to pay for the entire stadium...
 

lakerfan

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
16,962
Reaction score
12
They already have a company willing to pay for the entire stadium...

You are right, the city, under AEG's proposal, would not have to kick in one penny for the stadium. This, however, is a ''bold'' promise that many are skeptical about and the odds are very likely that they would have to ask for funds at a later stage.

But its more complicated then that, as you surely know. Even if you were to grant them their ability to self finance, however, there are other costs that would turn off the city to the idea. Just as an example, for them to build stadiums and all the way they want it, a part of the LA Convention Center needs to be removed. That's where city bonds and taxes come in -something AEG has already asked for- to get old development cleared out of the way. This is an expensive process that no political leader yet has stood behind.

You also have to take account of the inevitable road situation which no one considers now, but I'm sure will eventually come up. Who's going to pay for all the necessary roadwork so that people can access these lovely new parking lots, especially in traffic heavy LA? What about the environmental impact studies, entitlement process, and lease that the city would have to finance? You have to be very careful with these guys saying, "Oh! We won't spend any public money on the stadium..." Politicians here understand this, hence why were not rooting for the Los Angeles Zephyrs today and why it doesn't look like we will in the near future.
 

Rice18

I'm emotionally vested in me.
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
7,142
Reaction score
473
I guarantee we will not be moving. I know kam, you think we are moving blah blah blah. Just isn't happening.
 

Lake Louise

New Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
9,429
Reaction score
85
You know they've been pushing for a team in LA for awhile now and they need a new stadium. It would make sense, especially if they had the financial part of it out of the way.


I say NFC North cuts their losses and moves on.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
http://www.aedas.com/Content/images/pageimages/NFL-Stadium-Los-Angeles-USA.jpg

The model.

If im correct, looks like Sidney Rice in one of the pictures, and the bleachers are Purple.
 

lakerfan

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
16,962
Reaction score
12
http://www.aedas.com/Content/images/pageimages/NFL-Stadium-Los-Angeles-USA.jpg

The model.

If im correct, looks like Sidney Rice in one of the pictures, and the bleachers are Purple.
That is an image of the City of Industry stadium proposal, which is unrelated to the subject of the article. It is rumored to lag far behind AEG's model in terms of NFL and local political support because the proposed location is actually nowhere near Downtown Los Angeles; frankly, a prime example of expensive suburban sprawl. Outside of environmental studies, no real significant news has resulted from the project and I personally doubt will in the future.

AEG's plan makes sense simply because and the firm already finances a successful building (Staples Center) and it would be built in an area where sports complexes and entertainment facilities are already successful. Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier, it is a financial and political impossibility made less feasible in a harsh economic climate unless the NFL is willing to invest significant money. Coming out of a lockout, I doubt they are willing, and recent developments appear to support that:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82008c26/article/la-stadium-not-subject-of-aeg-boss-powwow-with-vikings?module=HP_headlines

Conclusion? The Vikings are to stay in Minny for the foreseeable future.
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
That is an image of the City of Industry stadium proposal, which is unrelated to the subject of the article. It is rumored to lag far behind AEG's model in terms of NFL and local political support because the proposed location is actually nowhere near Downtown Los Angeles; frankly, a prime example of expensive suburban sprawl. Outside of environmental studies, no real significant news has resulted from the project and I personally doubt will in the future.

AEG's plan makes sense simply because and the firm already finances a successful building (Staples Center) and it would be built in an area where sports complexes and entertainment facilities are already successful. Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier, it is a financial and political impossibility made less feasible in a harsh economic climate unless the NFL is willing to invest significant money. Coming out of a lockout, I doubt they are willing, and recent developments appear to support that:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82008c26/article/la-stadium-not-subject-of-aeg-boss-powwow-with-vikings?module=HP_headlines

Conclusion? The Vikings are to stay in Minny for the foreseeable future.
If the Vikings don't get a new stadium, they'll be going somewhere.
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
Your owner meeting with LA kind of gives the impression that it's possible.
Could just be sending a message to Minny that he's serious about moving this team and if they wanna keep the Vikings they better do something quickly
 

kam.

Mr. Blackmon
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
13,451
Reaction score
1,577
Could just be sending a message to Minny that he's serious about moving this team and if they wanna keep the Vikings they better do something quickly
Eh wouldn't really be a good idea, might be a back hand to Minnesota natives which would lead them to just saying "Fine, move the team then" by calling his bluff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top