Which team will have more success?

Vote for the team you think will have more success


  • Total voters
    7
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Swish

Guest
Which team will have more success over the next 10 years?
 

buzzy

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
20,671
Reaction score
1,172
fairly random choice of teams
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
I found it pretty easy to understand why he picked those teams, don't know why yall couldn't.

Bulls have Rose.
Thunder have Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka, etc.
Clippers have Griffen, Gordon, Bledsoe.
Wizards have Wall, Young, McGee.
Wolves have Love, Johnson, Rubio, etc.

Why the Raptors are there? IDK.
 
S

Swish

Guest
I found it pretty easy to understand why he picked those teams, don't know why yall couldn't.

Bulls have Rose.
Thunder have Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka, etc.
Clippers have Griffen, Gordon, Bledsoe.
Wizards have Wall, Young, McGee.
Wolves have Love, Johnson, Rubio, etc.

Why the Raptors are there? IDK.
DeRozan will be a star, And players like Bayless and Davis will also develop into very good role players. dont forget we get a high draft pick!
 

buzzy

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
20,671
Reaction score
1,172
It's still a bad choice to include the Thunder and Bulls in this one, since they will be competing for their respective conference's championship THIS year, in the Bulls' case maybe even for the NBA title.
While the Clips, Wolves and Wiz have young players that are going to be star players, they will still suck the next couple of years.

Eiter do a poll with the worst teams or one with teams on the rise that have a bright future, like the Sixers, Grizzlies or Pacers.

But you literally have the top ranked team of one conference and the last ranked team of the other conference in there.
 

DJT

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
27,416
Reaction score
302
LOL Why are the Bulls & Thunder in a poll with these teams?
M thoughts exactly.

The other teams are no where close to as good or promising as the Bulls & Thunder.

Just because the Raptors, Clips, T'wolves have good young players, doesn't make them anything.
 
S

Swish

Guest
It's only a prediction and I think you have to think about every single team that is on the poll before actually voting.

1) Thunder: They have already a 22 years old superstar Kevin Durant, a future star Russel Westbrook (22 years old), Ibaka (21 years old) and then Perkins.. damn this team has such a good future in the NBA! I think they could be title contenders in a year or too.

2) Bulls: Well... I don't think their future will be AMAZING in the next 10 years since Boozer won't play there anymore. They will have to build around Rose (obviously), Noah, and Deng. They have a good future but not for TEN years.

3)Wizards: With John Wall staying in town, I think they have a pretty legit future. They just need to find better big men since McGee has NO BASKETBALL IQ. Same thing for Blatche (that's why so many Wizards fans are mad about these two.. they have pretty good stats but their decisions are terrible). Let's not forget Nick Young who is fast becoming a really good SG.

4)Raptors: (I'll copy paste what I said in another thread) we have a lot of cap space. I know a lot of stars don't want to find their ass in Toronto but I'd wish this could happen. I think we could still sign some key players during this off-season. Maybe role players that could score the basketball with ease. DeRozan in my opinion has the potential to become a star. Since Bosh left, he stepped up a lot and now he's pretty dangerous for the opponents. We have the youngest roster in the league and with Bosh's departure, these young players have the chance to develop faster. That's why I think we have a good future.

5)Clippers: This team is actually going to be so exciting to watch if the future stars Eric Gordon, Blake Griffin and Eric Bledsoe are loyal to LA! They have an amazing future especially if they manage to keep Jordan and Aminu who will develop into very valuable role players.

6) Wolves: Flynn, Rubio, Love, Beasley. These guys have a good future but they have to keep everyone. If they lose one of these guys, this team isn't that good anymore. Wolves have been shit for so many years but with this upcoming young/good team, they will bring some ball in Minny

Let's vote: Very hard to vote but I'll go with the Thunder as my #1 option. KD and Westbrook have been beasts and they're only in their 20's! #2 will be my Raps.
 

Hurricane Season

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
27,130
Reaction score
1,228
6) Wolves: Flynn, Rubio, Love, Beasley. These guys have a good future but they have to keep everyone. If they lose one of these guys, this team isn't that good anymore. Wolves have been shit for so many years but with this upcoming young/good team, they will bring some ball in Minny
How much worse could they possibly be?
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
How could you possibly go with the Raptors at #2? Pretty much every team on this list has a franchise player other than the Raptors. Thunder have KD, Bulls have Rose, Wizards have Wall, and the Clippers have Blake Griffin. The Wolves don't necessarily have a franchise player in Kevin Love because I don't think you could be successful with him as the best player on your team, but he is still better than anything the Raptors have by a good amount. DeRozan is never going to be this superstar you're expecting him to be and Bargs was a major bust. Other than that, you guys don't really have anything worth mentioning on your roster that is a good piece to have as a nucleus to a good team.
 

youngguru

V͎͡Ị̠̳SI͉ƠN̡
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
4,436
Reaction score
485
How could you possibly go with the Raptors at #2? Pretty much every team on this list has a franchise player other than the Raptors. Thunder have KD, Bulls have Rose, Wizards have Wall, and the Clippers have Blake Griffin. The Wolves don't necessarily have a franchise player in Kevin Love because I don't think you could be successful with him as the best player on your team, but he is still better than anything the Raptors have by a good amount. DeRozan is never going to be this superstar you're expecting him to be and Bargs was a major bust. Other than that, you guys don't really have anything worth mentioning on your roster that is a good piece to have as a nucleus to a good team.
He's clearly a Raptors homer x 1000000
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
dont sleep on the Kings(Royals)

DeMarcus can ball. I worry about him moving to Socal, but im hoping he's fine
Tyreke has been hurt this year, he can still ball
Marcus Thornton is very good

bunch of other young players, new market, great owners. they will attract more FA's now that they are in Anaheim
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
And that's another reason why LA doesn't deserve an NFL team, they're about to have 3 NBA teams..
 

bestkeptsecret13

Chicago's Finest
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
32,619
Reaction score
174
I found it pretty easy to understand why he picked those teams, don't know why yall couldn't.

Bulls have Rose.
Thunder have Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka, etc.
Clippers have Griffen, Gordon, Bledsoe.
Wizards have Wall, Young, McGee.
Wolves have Love, Johnson, Rubio, etc.

Why the Raptors are there? IDK.
Because those teams are no where near the level the Bulls and Thunder are at? You could name any team in the league and they'll have some sort of young talent, putting the Clippers, Wizards, and Wolves in the conversation with two contenders is stupid. There's no guarantee those players even stay with those teams and how they progress.
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
Because those teams are no where near the level the Bulls and Thunder are at? You could name any team in the league and they'll have some sort of young talent, putting the Clippers, Wizards, and Wolves in the conversation with two contenders is stupid. There's no guarantee those players even stay with those teams and how they progress.
Not saying I agree with it, just saying it's common sense why he listed those teams.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top