- Thread starter
- #1
S
Swish
Guest
Which team will have more success over the next 10 years?
These are all teams that are pretty young and have a really good future in the NBA.LOL Why are the Bulls & Thunder in a poll with these teams?
Not at allfairly random choice of teams
DeRozan will be a star, And players like Bayless and Davis will also develop into very good role players. dont forget we get a high draft pick!I found it pretty easy to understand why he picked those teams, don't know why yall couldn't.
Bulls have Rose.
Thunder have Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka, etc.
Clippers have Griffen, Gordon, Bledsoe.
Wizards have Wall, Young, McGee.
Wolves have Love, Johnson, Rubio, etc.
Why the Raptors are there? IDK.
M thoughts exactly.LOL Why are the Bulls & Thunder in a poll with these teams?
How much worse could they possibly be?6) Wolves: Flynn, Rubio, Love, Beasley. These guys have a good future but they have to keep everyone. If they lose one of these guys, this team isn't that good anymore. Wolves have been shit for so many years but with this upcoming young/good team, they will bring some ball in Minny
I'm talking about their future. If they start developing into a good team and then lose one of these guys, there is a prob in MinnyHow much worse could they possibly be?
He's clearly a Raptors homer x 1000000How could you possibly go with the Raptors at #2? Pretty much every team on this list has a franchise player other than the Raptors. Thunder have KD, Bulls have Rose, Wizards have Wall, and the Clippers have Blake Griffin. The Wolves don't necessarily have a franchise player in Kevin Love because I don't think you could be successful with him as the best player on your team, but he is still better than anything the Raptors have by a good amount. DeRozan is never going to be this superstar you're expecting him to be and Bargs was a major bust. Other than that, you guys don't really have anything worth mentioning on your roster that is a good piece to have as a nucleus to a good team.
Because those teams are no where near the level the Bulls and Thunder are at? You could name any team in the league and they'll have some sort of young talent, putting the Clippers, Wizards, and Wolves in the conversation with two contenders is stupid. There's no guarantee those players even stay with those teams and how they progress.I found it pretty easy to understand why he picked those teams, don't know why yall couldn't.
Bulls have Rose.
Thunder have Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka, etc.
Clippers have Griffen, Gordon, Bledsoe.
Wizards have Wall, Young, McGee.
Wolves have Love, Johnson, Rubio, etc.
Why the Raptors are there? IDK.
Not saying I agree with it, just saying it's common sense why he listed those teams.Because those teams are no where near the level the Bulls and Thunder are at? You could name any team in the league and they'll have some sort of young talent, putting the Clippers, Wizards, and Wolves in the conversation with two contenders is stupid. There's no guarantee those players even stay with those teams and how they progress.