- Thread starter
- #1
We knew this was obviously gonna catch some serious flack. But I look at it this way.Ponder at 12 makes me cringe.
Completely agreed.Yeah, I understand the pick and how most people feel about him, but everyone knows my personal opinion on Ponder... 16 would still be way too high for him if it were up to me.
Sorry, did I miss a joke?LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
I would bet my soul that the Vikings don't take Ponder. Both you and TTN over rate QB's.Sorry, did I miss a joke?
This again shows your lack of knowledge of the NFL Draft.I would bet my soul that the Vikings don't take Ponder. Both you and TTN over rate QB's.
Why do you think 12-16 isn't a big jump. Its not saying hes projected to 16 because his stock is at 16. Hes projected at 16 because Gene Smith is inlove with him and always tends to "reach" for picks. Vikings wont take him at 12.We knew this was obviously gonna catch some serious flack. But I look at it this way.
If Ponder and his stock have risen to 16 (Jacksonville) why wouldn't the Vikings be on him at number twelve? Leslie Frazier smokescreen or not, has made it clear they NEED a QB, and he could easily feel more confident with Ponder over Locker at this point.
Thank you Kam and okay I am a dumb ass ?Why do you think 12-16 isn't a big jump. Its not saying hes projected to 16 because his stock is at 16. Hes projected at 16 because Gene Smith is inlove with him and always tends to "reach" for picks. Vikings wont take him at 12.
+1I understand going against the grain, but every comment you are making is basically you saying "I'm not trying to be right, I'm trying to be different."