The Best Division in the NFL?

[Falcons11497]

Only one division had 3 teams with 10+ wins last season...

and only one division has had 3 of the 4 teams appear in a superbowl this decade

 

[kam.]

I edited my post.

But 8-9 easily means they could win more than that. I would of said 10 but you would of played the homer card.
But then again you play the homer card any time I say anything regarding the Lions.

It's not only me, Lion fans here are what made me hate the Lions, and personally I hope they fail every week of the year just so I can watch yall at the end of every year go "You know what, I think this is our year" because its quite hilarious.

 

[RipCity32]

Don't give me that shit.

Vikings are sorry, Chicago is beatable and Packers are the only elite team in that division.

All opinions.
Bears weren't beatable in the playoffs, only beat by the Super Bowl champs. Technically every team in the league is beatable. No one went 16-0 this year.

Like just cause you say the Vikings are sorry and Chicago is beatable, doesn't mean they are lol.

 

[RipCity32]

It's not only me, Lion fans here are what made me hate the Lions, and personally I hope they fail every week of the year just so I can watch yall at the end of every year go "You know what, I think this is our year" because its quite hilarious.

Am I suppose to care what you think bout the Lions? LMAO.

I could give a fuck less, you worry bout the Jags. Who went 8-8 in their sorry ass division.

 

[kam.]

Am I suppose to care what you think bout the Lions? LMAO.

I could give a fuck less, you worry bout the Jags. Who went 8-8 in their sorry ass division.

The AFC Souths talent > NFC North. IDGAF what you say. You dont see me sititng here preaching that the AFC South > everybody else though. Especially when the AFC South hasn't had a 0-16 team in the past 5 years.

 

[kam.]

All opinions.
Bears weren't beatable in the playoffs, only beat by the Super Bowl champs. Technically every team in the league is beatable. No one went 16-0 this year.

Like just cause you say the Vikings are sorry and Chicago is beatable, doesn't mean they are lol.

Who did the bears beat in the Playoffs? Oh wait, the 7-9 Seahawks.

uhh

they good?

 

[RipCity32]

The AFC Souths talent > NFC North. IDGAF what you say. You dont see me sititng here preaching that the AFC South > everybody else though. Especially when the AFC South hasn't had a 0-16 team in the past 5 years.

Lol, no.
That's cool though, cause I'm pretty sure no one in the NFC North went 0-16 last season, which is the only season that matters when talking about the best division in football.

I'm quite sure the question wasn't the best division in the last 5 years. That was a solid try though lol.

Who did the bears beat in the Playoffs? Oh wait, the 7-9 Seahawks.

uhh

they good?

Who beat a team from the NFC South, which is what many say was the best division. If the Seahawks suck, the Saints suck.

 

[kam.]

Lol, no.
That's cool though, cause I'm pretty sure no one in the NFC North went 0-16 last season, which is the only season that matters when talking about the best division in football.

I'm quite sure the question wasn't the best division in the last 5 years. That was a solid try though lol.


Who beat a team from the NFC South, which is what many say was the best division. If the Seahawks suck, the Saints suck.

Well how come everybody else can talk about what there division has done in the past year or couple of years, but as soon as I bring up 0-16, I cant touch that subject?

Also doesn't matter who they beat, The saints slip in Seattle doesn't mean the Seahawks are good. If the Seahawks played the Bears in Seattle they would of beat the bears too.

 

[RipCity32]

Well how come everybody else can talk about what there division has done in the past year or couple of years, but as soon as I bring up 0-16, I cant touch that subject?

Also doesn't matter who they beat, The saints slip in Seattle doesn't mean the Seahawks are good. If the Seahawks played the Bears in Seattle they would of beat the bears too.

I haven't once said anything bout the past seasons. Why anyone is measuring a divisions success off anything but this year is beyond me lol.

And that's surely debatable. Seahawks suck, the Bears don't.

 

[kam.]

I haven't once said anything bout the past seasons. Why anyone is measuring a divisions success off anything but this year is beyond me lol.

And that's surely debatable. Seahawks suck, the Bears don't.

The Bears don't suck? All because they beat the worst playoff team in NFL history to make it to the NFC Championship?

 

[RipCity32]

Finished 1st in the division of the Super Bowl champs, in the best division in football.

 

[kam.]

Finished 1st in the division of the Super Bowl champs, in the best division in football.

Ahh Smh..

You mean to seriously tell me if you were to put matchups between the NFC North vs the NFC East/South or AFC EAST/NORTH/West/South that the NFC North would have a winning ratio?

 

[RipCity32]

Best team in the league, a great Bears team, and the bottom 2 teams better than most bottom 2 teams, yeah, I like those odds.

 

[kam.]

Best team in the league, a great Bears team, and the bottom 2 teams better than most bottom 2 teams, yeah, I like those odds.

OK well according to 2010

NFC North had a 7-9 record vs the AFC East.. thats a losing record.

2-2 record vs NFC South (Tied, not better)

9-7 vs NFC East.
You're wrong here.

 

[WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18]

My order would be....

1. AFC North
2. NFC East
3. NFC South
4. AFC South
5. NFC North
6. AFC West
7. AFC East
8. NFC West

 

[kam.]

My order would be....

1. AFC North
2. NFC East
3. NFC South
4. AFC South
5. NFC North
6. AFC West
7. AFC East
8. NFC West

I'm going to break down the AFC North here too.

Pittsburgh, good.
Ravens, good.
Bengals, Terrible.
Browns, Have been the laughing stock of the NFL for years. The AFC North even though they are all competetive against each other, its a middle division in the NFL, along with the NFC North. All because they have the Superbowl champions, and the "SCRATCHED IN NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME LOSERS" doesn't make them the best division in the NFL. Sorry I crashed yalls homer dreams, Welcome to reality.

 

[RipCity32]

OK well according to 2010

NFC North had a 7-9 record vs the AFC East.. thats a losing record.

2-2 record vs NFC South (Tied, not better)

9-7 vs NFC East.
You're wrong here.

2 of those losses came from Detroit against NY and NE. Who are clearly better teams.
Same goes for Minnesota. Losses to NY and NE.

You can't really give division vs. division records and call that valid. Cause obviously AFC East's top 2 are better than the NFC North's bottom 2..

 

[Elite]

Oh almighty kam, please bless us with your opinion of who the best division in football is so we can bow down to you.

 

[kam.]

2 of those losses came from Detroit against NY and NE. Who are clearly better teams.
Same goes for Minnesota. Losses to NY and NE.

You can't really give division vs. division records and call that valid. Cause obviously AFC East's top 2 are better than the NFC North's bottom 2..

If they're the best division, then they better be good all around. Don't give me that shit.

 

[RipCity32]

If they're the best division, then they better be good all around. Don't give me that shit.

No division is better 4 teams deep than the others..