Seattle: Win or Lose?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
If Seattle wins Sunday, they'll draft no higher than 21st.
If Seattle loses Sunday, they could draft as high as 6th.

So, which one is it?
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
Win. You get a shot at the playoffs, you gotta take it.
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WRxm0oGbnRI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WRxm0oGbnRI?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

A.E

Vottomatic
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
14,335
Reaction score
132
I have this feeling that St. Louis doesnt play well & to further add to an already insane season...Seattle's broke-ass gets into the postseason.
 

DJT

Members
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Messages
27,416
Reaction score
302
I think Bradford and the Rams will be too much too handle. Seattle is gonna start Hasslebeck who is most likely still injured. If he gets sacked good, he'll be out. Then Whitehurst will come in and he isn't gonna lead them to a win.
 

STLZACH

Go Blues!
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
22
I have this feeling that St. Louis doesnt play well & to further add to an already insane season...Seattle's broke-ass gets into the postseason.
Na man, Bradford is just too clutch.

I think Bradford and the Rams will be too much too handle. Seattle is gonna start Hasslebeck who is most likely still injured. If he gets sacked good, he'll be out. Then Whitehurst will come in and he isn't gonna lead them to a win.
Hasselback isn't starting, it's Whitehurst.
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
Bradford is too clutch? Lmao, he's done nothing clutch in the NFL and never did anything clutch in college, losing both bowl games he played in, including the National Championship.

Anyhow, I'm still taking the Rams but if I was either team, I'd want to lose to get that draft pick. Neither will do anything the playoffs but get embarrassed.
 

Lake Louise

New Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
9,429
Reaction score
85
I'm going with the Rams. I don't see either team doing anything in the playoffs, but St. Louis, I think, will be the one that at least gets the chance to try. Unless somehow Charlie Whitehurst someone manages to pull it off for Seattle.
 

Blake

I'm goin' lamb bruh.
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
7,620
Reaction score
269
Am in the wrong here for saying that this game should be like the episode of South Park; where they wanted to lose in the baseball playoffs so they could enjoy their summer? But instead of that, they get a little longer off-season and on top of that get a much better draft pick.

I'm not for it, but don't be suprised if the Seahawks -- or Rams -- don't put forth their best effort. I know as much as anyone does that neither of them have a dog's chance in the playoffs, we all know this, at least when the Giants did it they had a decent coach and two awesome running-backs that worked well together.

If I were Carrol, I wouldn't put my all into this game, nearly missing the playoffs in your first season as a coach isn't that bad, hell it's good, so why not miss the playoffs and get a top-10 pick out of it? It's seemingly a win-win situation.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
4,446
Reaction score
96
Am in the wrong here for saying that this game should be like the episode of South Park; where they wanted to lose in the baseball playoffs so they could enjoy their summer? But instead of that, they get a little longer off-season and on top of that get a much better draft pick.

I'm not for it, but don't be suprised if the Seahawks -- or Rams -- don't put forth their best effort. I know as much as anyone does that neither of them have a dog's chance in the playoffs, we all know this, at least when the Giants did it they had a decent coach and two awesome running-backs that worked well together.

If I were Carrol, I wouldn't put my all into this game, nearly missing the playoffs in your first season as a coach isn't that bad, hell it's good, so why not miss the playoffs and get a top-10 pick out of it? It's seemingly a win-win situation.
I would put my all into this if I were him, because you play to win the game. Anything can happen, see the 08 Cardinals. Yeah I know the Seahawks don't have Warner, Darnell Docket, Boldin, Fitz, Dansby, and others, but we have seen crazy stuff happen in this league. Like you said, if they lose they still get a Top 10 pick.
 

footballplaya52

Solo Dolo
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
12,623
Reaction score
614
lose.

they arent going anywhere in the playoffs, they are better off to get a better pick to make a run next year.
 

WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
16,192
Reaction score
296
Rams are the better team, they will win this game. Then what? Play the Saints in the first round?
 

SaintFan25

#JK25
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
4,745
Reaction score
133
Doesn't matter who wins cause unless the Panthers pull some kind of miracle we got them in the first round.
 

cruzg24

It is what it is
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
21,184
Reaction score
209
The Seahawks should play to lose the game, theyre not going to make any noise in the playoffs and the regular season has proven that. Take the loss and continue building that team in Seattle. And besides, who wants to see a 7-9 team in the playoffs is just plain pathetic.
 

WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
16,192
Reaction score
296
Well, they won't play to lose the game, but they will lose the game no matter what, they just aren't very good.
 

Lake Louise

New Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
9,429
Reaction score
85
I wouldn't say they would be playing to lose. Just putting up just enough effort not to win.
 

STLZACH

Go Blues!
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
22
Am in the wrong here for saying that this game should be like the episode of South Park; where they wanted to lose in the baseball playoffs so they could enjoy their summer? But instead of that, they get a little longer off-season and on top of that get a much better draft pick.

I'm not for it, but don't be suprised if the Seahawks -- or Rams -- don't put forth their best effort. I know as much as anyone does that neither of them have a dog's chance in the playoffs, we all know this, at least when the Giants did it they had a decent coach and two awesome running-backs that worked well together.

If I were Carrol, I wouldn't put my all into this game, nearly missing the playoffs in your first season as a coach isn't that bad, hell it's good, so why not miss the playoffs and get a top-10 pick out of it? It's seemingly a win-win situation.
Between Stephen Jackson, Bradford, and Danny Amendola, I think we should be alright. We got unlucky with the Saints. Now, If we still had Mark Clayton, we wouldn't be having this conversation, because we would be 8-7, looking at 9-7.
 

.infamous

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
25,700
Reaction score
771
Between Stephen Jackson, Bradford, and Danny Amendola, I think we should be alright. We got unlucky with the Saints. Now, If we still had Mark Clayton, we wouldn't be having this conversation, because we would be 8-7, looking at 9-7.
But you lost to the lions 44-6. You guys arent that good lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top