- Thread starter
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 14,335
- Reaction score
- 132
In November, Larry Brooks of the New York Post made what was deemed a "wacky" suggestion about the New Jersey Devils: That they trade franchise goaltender Martin Brodeur as a way out of their death spiral this season.
As Devils fade, 'Trade Marty Brodeur' speculation intensifies
This was made all the wackier by Brooks' suggestion that a 38-year-old goalie with one playoff semifinals appearance in the last four postseasons could leverage John Carlson or Mike Green from the Washington Capitals.
Since Brooks's column, the Devils have gone a stellar 1-7, remaining one U.S.S. Islanders Titanic away from the conference basement in what's become a lost season.
Dire times call for drastic suggestions, such as Bobby Holik's assertion that the Devils should trade Zach Parise to the Pittsburgh Penguins for Evgeni Malkin for the benefit of Ilya Kovalchuck.
But as the season continues to circle the drain, the absurdity of Brooks's suggestion doesn't seem as absurd any longer to some observers. Scott Burnside of ESPN wonders where the value is on the Devils' roster as far as moveable parts, and thinks Brodeur is its most tradable asset:
Flipping Brodeur for prospects and to clear salary space for, say, Zach Parise next summer obviously makes sense in the context of where the League and the team are in 2010-11. Even if big-ticket goalies are can make a difference, they're the exception to the rule in an NHL that has Cup contenders like the Philadelphia Flyers, Chicago Blackhawks and San Jose Sharks doing goaltending on the cheap.The game's greatest goaltender is back from an elbow/arm injury but has played poorly, a function perhaps of rust and the team in front of him. He has another season left at $5.2 million in both salary and cap hit. Hard to imagine he would play beyond the end of his current deal with the team in such dire straights. Would Brodeur waive his no-trade clause for another shot at a Cup? Who knows, but what would Brodeur's value be to a Cup-hungry Washington team that has two promising young goaltenders and a bevy of young prospects? Or to Tampa? What was once unthinkable, Brodeur in a jersey other than the Devils, now must become part of the discussion for a team at the bottom of the well.
But for a Devils fan ... does logic have a home in that decision? Does trading Brodeur before he can retire as a Devils simply symbolize how plagued and misguided this once proud franchise has become? Or how the rebuilding process has begun despite having a $100 million left wing in the first year of a 15-year deal? Can a Devils fan stomach seeing Brodeur traded, or is this the Mets and Tom Seaver all over again?
There's plenty of time for that debate. Because the Brodeur speculation is just starting, and the Devils aren't getting any better.
-Yahoo! Sports