- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 29,592
- Reaction score
- 474
Lars better turn out to be a good player. I think Schultz will be a decent 3rd liner at best imo.
That Halak was gonna ask for a ton of money and they don't want to give it to him, so they trade him for whatever they can get*as a Bruins fan, I love it. From a hockey standpoint, WTF ARE YOU THINKING MONTREAL?
NOOOOOO definitely not.I heard that it was Perron and STL's 1st round pick.
Perron and a 1st is worth WAY more than Halak...Nevermind:
eeew, I feel like the Canadiens could have and should have gotten more. Perron and a 1st is a great deal...this deal isn't though. I'd love to hear the organization justify this.
I bet you areI'm from montreal and i'm <Censored>en unhappy right not so mad at gauthier ...
Which is probably why he is now a Blue. I would be astounded if we didnt already have something worked out with Jaro before dealing for him as a RFA.But from what i know is that Halak was about to ask lot of money and if we did that the probleme will have been with our center Plecky !
Ive watched him play and hes far from kopitar... more like Lucic as I said in my last postSo what Gauthier did here is that he got rid of halak for Lars Ellers a 1st pick in the 2007 draft they compare him to Anze Kopitar
Doubtful that it will be huge. he should blossom into a 3rd MAYBE 2nd line forward. but until playoff time, when grinders are much more effective, hes nothing. hes good in front of the net though. again, kind of like a Lucic. Now that I think of it he reminds me of Tkachuk is his golden years.i got no idea about lars now i wish that he makes a huge impact over here in MTL !
Its the Calgary Hitmen. Hes good but he wont be much more than a 4th liner at best.For schultz his a big man could fight too and he is captain of his farm team so must be good !
Im pretty sure I just changed your mind.After thinking about all these i told my self that isnt that bad but still halak was our main man :S
He went from Lucic, to 3rd liner, to Tkachuk in his golden years in the span of 2 posts?Doubtful that it will be huge. he should blossom into a 3rd MAYBE 2nd line forward. but until playoff time, when grinders are much more effective, hes nothing. hes good in front of the net though. again, kind of like a Lucic. Now that I think of it he reminds me of Tkachuk is his golden years.
bigger and a tad stronger, but other than that same styleEller is not the next Lucic Zach, not even close. Lucic is 6'4" and 220, much bigger than Eller and also much stronger. Eller is versatile and can make plays in traffic but he's not the bruising powerforward Milan is.
You're making Eller out to be way more physical than he actually is. Lucic is a maniac and a fighter that has a dynamic scoring ability. Read any scouting report on Eller and "strength" is listed a major weakness.bigger and a tad stronger, but other than that same style
im trying to talk eller down lmfaoYou're making Eller out to be way more physical than he actually is. Lucic is a maniac and a fighter that has a dynamic scoring ability. Read any scouting report on Eller and "strength" is listed a major weakness.
You just got done ripping off Montreal on this deal. Please stop patronizing the rest of us and selling us on Lars Eller.
So mentioning that Eller is "like Lucic" 4 different times and then drawing a comparison to Tkachuk in his "golden years" is talking the guy down??im trying to talk eller down lmfao
you guys didnt understand what i was trying to say...So mentioning that Eller is "like Lucic" 4 different times and then drawing a comparison to Tkachuk in his "golden years" is talking the guy down??