For the Guy Who Said Cutler Couldn't Do It Without Marshall & Royal

[bestkeptsecret13]

LMAO!
It's sad 1 game is considered a major win.

I thought the Redskins coach was gonna get fired to be honest... Especially after the way they were talking about his play calling in the previous game. Haha

 

[A.E]

It really says something when ur celebrating a 2-1 record at Week 4.

The 49ers are a much better team that the Seahawks and the 2009 Steelers aren't the 2008 Steelers.

 

[The Young One]

This is pretty much already a classic thread.

 

[bestkeptsecret13]

It really says something when ur celebrating a 2-1 record at Week 4.

The 49ers are a much better team that the Seahawks and the 2009 Steelers aren't the 2008 Steelers.

I'm not celebrating anything... I'm just stating that after Week 3, Cutler is the one making his WR better, it wasn't the WR that were making him better, because you can clearly see Eddie Royal isn't doing <Censored>.

Ok, so you can say the 49ers are better than the Seahawks, but the Steelers (even if they aren't the '08 version) are WAY better than the Lions and Green Bay is WAY better than Cleveland.

 

[RipCity32]

I thought the Redskins coach was gonna get fired to be honest... Especially after the way they were talking about his play calling in the previous game. Haha

Lmao so did I.

 

[A.E]

I'm not celebrating anything... I'm just stating that after Week 3, Cutler is the one making his WR better, it wasn't the WR that were making him better, because you can clearly see Eddie Royal isn't doing <Censored>.

Ok, so you can say the 49ers are better than the Seahawks, but the Steelers (even if they aren't the '08 version) are WAY better than the Lions and Green Bay is WAY better than Cleveland.

I am also failing to see where I specifically said: "Cutler Can't Do It Without Marshall & Royal.."

All I pretty much said was I will wait and see if he can doing w/o them and the Bears are a mediocre football team who couldn't finish ahead of the Vikings even if we traded Adrian Petersons.

 

[.GR]

I also don't want to hear any junk coming from the Steel...err...I mean Raiders fan.

That's always your comeback on me. I mean seriously, you've said it enough. Get over it.

 

[bestkeptsecret13]

I am also failing to see where I specifically said: "Cutler Can't Do It Without Marshall & Royal.."

NFC North
1. Minnesota Vikings
2. Green Bay Packers
3. Chicago Bears
4. Detroit Lions

** Whether its Favre of Tarvaris Jackson under center, I love the Vikings. Game's best player, one of the game's best defenses and this team has looked great all pre-season. Aaron Rogers is another guy looking good this pre-season and I believe consistent football keeps Green Bay in the playoff hunt. Jay Cutler - Devin Hester + Earl Bennett + Brandon Rideau = Fail. No Marshall/Royal tandem for Cutler and I don't like the secondary. The Bears couldn't figure out the Vikings in 2008 and what's changed on their defense since then? I'll just give Lions' fans the good news: Matt Stafford will be more successful than Mark Sanchez b/c Stafford has Calvin Johnson to throw to.

--From the Season Predictions thread.

 

[A.E]

--From the Season Predictions thread.

I am patient and its a long season. I am confident that once all 17 weeks have been played, I will have the last laugh. I just hope you realize that not every opponent is going to be stupid enough to leave Devin Hester wide open down the middle of the field.

Bottom Line remains the same: Minnesota > Chicago

 

[bestkeptsecret13]

I am patient and its a long season. I am confident that once all 17 weeks have been played, I will have the last laugh. I just hope you realize that not every opponent is going to be stupid enough to leave Devin Hester wide open down the middle of the field.

Bottom Line remains the same: Minnesota > Chicago

Alright we'll see dude, we shall see... It's not like Hester's been wide open, he's had to make some pretty tough catches these past few weeks. Even if they do double team him, Bennett, Knox, Olsen, Clark, K. Davis and Forte are all capable options in the passing game.

 

[A.E]

Alright we'll see dude, we shall see... It's not like Hester's been wide open, he's had to make some pretty tough catches these past few weeks. Even if they do double team him, Bennett, Knox, Olsen, Clark, K. Davis and Forte are all capable options in the passing game.

Yes, we will see exactly how capable these no-names are when they have to go up against Baltimore or San Francisco. Whether they are capable or not, you have to play defense in order to win games. Chicago is 1-2 right now if Matt Hasslebeck started on Sunday.

 

[bestkeptsecret13]

Yes, we will see exactly how capable these no-names are when they have to go up against Baltimore or San Francisco. Whether they are capable or not, you have to play defense in order to win games. Chicago is 1-2 right now if Matt Hasslebeck started on Sunday.

No names? Earl Bennett is a 2nd round pick for a reason... Sure he didn't play last year, but he was picked high for a reason, the guy's got talent. Johnny Knox? Have you watched the Bears play football this season? He's been one of the most exciting guys to watch in the game. He can break one at any time, he's just as fast as anybody in the NFL. I'm not even gonna get into the TE combination of Clark and Olsen, calling them no names is just more stupidity. Forte? Right...

Defense wins games? Yes it does, and the Bears defense has played well. 9th in total defense, 12th in pass defense (for a team with what's suppose to be a <Censored>ty secondary) and 13th in run defense (one behind Minnesota who you said had one of the best run defenses in the league).

I don't really see how you can say we are 1-2 if Hasselback played... That's pretty irrelevant. I could say we'd be 3-0 if Urlacher was healthy to finish the Packer game. Injuries happen, it's part of the game, that's no excuse...

 

[elcheato]

Yes, we will see exactly how capable these no-names are when they have to go up against Baltimore or San Francisco. Whether they are capable or not, you have to play defense in order to win games. Chicago is 1-2 right now if Matt Hasslebeck started on Sunday.

lol at calling them no names when you were bragging about the Vikings having Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice.

 

[A.E]

lol at calling them no names when you were bragging about the Vikings having Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice.

Bragging about Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice? Hardly. I will say that I've been a huge supporter of Bobby Wade, certainly not Rice.

Stop putting words into my mouth.

I am done with this retarded topic. Just know that the I will be making a thread for every single Bears loss this season.

So that means about 7 or 8.

 

[Pugz]

I am done with this retarded topic. Just know that the I will be making a thread for every single Bears loss this season.

 

[dcpwner]

i lol'ed the whole time through this thread, bks is <Censored>ting on you man.

And if you think you guys would be anywhere without Adrian Peterson you're wrong.

 

[footballplaya52]

people always post that but then you end up seeing them in an argument

 

[elcheato]

Bragging about Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice? Hardly. I will say that I've been a huge supporter of Bobby Wade, certainly not Rice.

Stop putting words into my mouth.

I am done with this retarded topic. Just know that the I will be making a thread for every single Bears loss this season.

So that means about 7 or 8.

In the thread that bks is referring to, you stated that the Bears have no proven WRs, then you named Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice as receivers on the Vikings, basically gloating about them..

 

[bestkeptsecret13]

Bragging about Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice? Hardly. I will say that I've been a huge supporter of Bobby Wade, certainly not Rice.

Stop putting words into my mouth.

I am done with this retarded topic. Just know that the I will be making a thread for every single Bears loss this season.

So that means about 7 or 8.

You called the Bears WR's terrible and then went on to list Wade and Rice as capable receivers that the Vikings have (in the other thread). Bennett, Hester, and Knox are all just as good if not better than those two, so yeah, you weren't really bragging, you were just hating on the Bears players even though they are just as good as the Vikings.

Go ahead and make a thread for every time the Bears lose, it'll just show that you're pissed of that you were proved wrong in this thread. You know you called the Bears "terrible", when they only finished ONE GAME behind the Vikings last year. Please tell me what major acquisition the Vikings made? Yes, they got Favre. Well, we got Cutler, it's a wash dude... You can't tell me the Vikings got soooo much better and the Bears are somehow terrible. If we're terrible, then so are you, because you finished ONE GAME ahead of us.

 

[WHO-DEY-BENGALS_18]

This is why I just let people think whatever they want anymore because I'm sick of arguing over stupid <Censored>. Let the team do the talking. AE also said some things about my team but I'll hold back until week 17 before I say if he was right or not. I'm sure the Bears will give the Vikings a run for their money. It doesn't matter who Jay Cutler has for WR's, he's a good QB either way, period. Now, I'm not sure the Bears will beat the Vikings this year but I wouldn't underestimate it either.