The NFL Bans Customized Facemasks

Big Bid'Ness

4 Life
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
70,798
Reaction score
821
From:bleacherreport
 
The NFL Bans Customized Facemasks Because Football Isn't Supposed to Be Fun



Robert Mathis sporting a customized facemask.
Brian Spurlock-USA TODAY Sports
 
The NFL continues its crusade to make the beloved sport as boring as possible, as it has banned customized facemasks for players not receiving medical clearance.
 
Who said sports were supposed to be fun anyway?
 
CBS Sports reports players hoping to show a bit more flair and style in the form of customized facemasks will have to make do with the same ones used by every other player.
 
The website reports NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy sent an email to NFL.com, asserting players will need medical clearance if they want to look truly original out on the field. So players like Darnell Dockett and Robert Mathis, who simply wanted to look cool and far more menacing, will have to settle with what they are given.
For those not acquainted with Dockett's mask, here is a picture the Arizona Cardinals once tweeted out.


Photo Credit: Arizona Cardinals

And here is a picture from Mathis who posted to Instagram, "Our Off Coordinator #PepHammy refers to me as#BANE during meetings hahaaa." 


Photo Credit: Robert Mathis Instagram

 
Alas, a disappointed Mathis tweeted out the following.
 
We feel your pain, big guy, because there was a general hope these types of facemasks would begin to pop up around the league.
 
Before we continue, it's important to note those players who need to customize their gear for medical reasons are allowed to do so.
 
That means the Ravens' Chris Canty and the Giants' Justin Tuck will get to wear their special facemasks, fueling an apparent jealousy around the league.

Jim O'Connor-USA TODAY Sports

 
The Baltimore Sun's Aaron Wilson delivers Canty's thoughts on the ban:
If you are looking for a reason the NFL is putting its foot down on this issue, good luck. It seems the league is like that frustrated parent who tells kids to stop what they are doing "because I said so."
 
Remember, this is the same league that recently decided to inform athletes they would be penalized for daring to spin the football towards another player.
 
According to Pro Football Talk, the league is ready to stamp out a great many celebratory dances this upcoming season, essentially taking on the duty of a dance chaperone nobody invited.
 
Perhaps the league doesn't want to entertain the slippery slope that comes with players infusing their style into the facemask.
 
It's rather unfortunate considering the players who are hit, injured and concussed for the sake of competition rarely get the same visibility enjoyed by MLB or NBA players.
 
Their faces are forever hidden behind uniform facemasks, along with jerseys, shoes and armbands that conform to code.
 
This would have been a cool way to allow players to show off their personalities to fans watching from home. Then again, nobody ever claimed the NFL was in the business of being cool.
 
Let's just hope touchdowns don't get any more exciting than they already are, or the NFL will ban them from the game.
 
 
 
 

Teagz

Dogs.
Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 1, 2011
Messages
18,967
Reaction score
460
They were getting pretty ridiculous....
 

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
but they help and serve a purpose. fucking stupid ass rules.
 

buzzy

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
20,671
Reaction score
1,172

 
that just looks retarded
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
I think it's pretty dope lol.
 

Giantmetfan07

Shocking The World
ADMIN
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
34,763
Reaction score
561
i've always liked the masks too. The league is just getting ridiculous now. There's really no legit reason to ban these. 
 

BwareDWare94

Where were you when the world stopped turning?
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
8,989
Reaction score
140
I don't mind them when it's nearly impossible to get a finger stuck in them, but I always thought the holes in Tuck's were a bit too big to be completely safe. It's unlikely a player snags a finger in there, but if he does, we're potentially looking at a horrific injury. I think Canty's and Docket's were better suited to avoid any snagging. 
 
At the same time, we're forced to ask, "What does it matter?" They don't give an advantage at all. To me, this is like saying "Cover your tattoos."
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top