Saints trade Jimmy Graham to Seahawks

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
In an NFL offseason already filled with shocking trades, the Seattle Seahawks appear poised to make the most significant deal yet.

The Seahawks have reportedly agreed to a trade with the New Orleans Saints that will see the team acquire star tight end Jimmy Graham and a fourth-round pick in exchange for center Max Unger and a first-round selection, according to Jay Glazer of FOXSports.
 

Delirium

Super Legend
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
4,962
Reaction score
109
This is a great trade for the Saints. We get a top 5 center, a 1st round pick, and we get Jimmy Graham's soft ass off our team. Mentally soft, physically soft, butterfingers, not a good blocker, celebrates each catch like a TD and celebrates each TD like it won the game. He'll struggle in Seattle with a run-first team and he's not a great blocker and Wilson will not be able to throw the same passes to him that Brees did. Mediocre trade for them, great trade for us. We don't need him at all but we do need draft picks and talent on the O-line.
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
A lot of stuff is starting to come out about Jimmy and I have to say if true I'm glad he is gone.
 

Delirium

Super Legend
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
4,962
Reaction score
109
nolafan33 said:
A lot of stuff is starting to come out about Jimmy and I have to say if true I'm glad he is gone.
No report is gonna tell me what I didn't already know about him.
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
Delirium said:
No report is gonna tell me what I didn't already know about him.
I mean we all knew, but I never knew it was so serious
 

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
take it he's a douche?
 

jonathanlambert33

P-ROBlem
Staff member
Global Moderator
Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
31,527
Reaction score
876
Yes, apparently had run ins with multiple players last year. Sean Payton designated him as one of the problems in the locker room
 

Pugz

#ForPaul
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
127,713
Reaction score
2,100
he seems like he'd be an issue.
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
Well regardless of what kind of guy he is, the Seahawks just got a hell of lot scarier on offense.
 

Delirium

Super Legend
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
4,962
Reaction score
109
RipCity32 said:
Well regardless of what kind of guy he is, the Seahawks just got a hell of lot scarier on offense.
I'd like to see if he'd be any better than Luke Willson. He'll be blocking a whole lot more, and he won't have a Sean Payton-designed offensive scheme to play in. Nor will he have Drew Brees as his QB.
 

RipCity32

King Of The East
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
88,197
Reaction score
730
I'd assume they'd accomadate the offense to better tailor his skill set. Cause he isn't a very good blocker at all.
 

elusive

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
273
Reaction score
7
Delirium said:
I'd like to see if he'd be any better than Luke Willson. He'll be blocking a whole lot more, and he won't have a Sean Payton-designed offensive scheme to play in. Nor will he have Drew Brees as his QB.
lmao. Luke Wilson didn't even have a target in the Super Bowl and had less than 1/3rd of the production Graham had last season.
 
Love how the Saints fans are trashing him when he is a top 2 TE in the game, has the most receiving yards by a TE in his first five seasons in NFL history, has 40 red zone TDs since 2010, and had more receptions last season when he was split out wide than any Seahawks receiver had period. As much as I dislike Seattle, this is a massive move and he's is going to dominate as the #1 target in Seattle.
 

Delirium

Super Legend
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
4,962
Reaction score
109
I "trash" him because he's a big fraud. All those stats he puts up are deceiving when you don't factor in his huge number of drops and how soft he is. He could be twice as good as he actually is. People used to talk about him like he's Gronkowski. He's nowhere close. This isn't 2011 anymore. And he definitely won't be as successful in Seattle, sorry to burst anyone's bubble.
 

elusive

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
273
Reaction score
7
Luke Wilson dropped 10% of his targets, so I guess it's an upgrade...
 
Seriously, Gronkowski had one less drop last season with 7 more targets, you're blowing that out of proportion because in 2012 he had a high amount (and 3 in 2013).
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
Gronk's hands are overstated fwiw


But Graham will be PERFECTLY fine in Seattle. He isn't replacing Willson, he's replacing Lockette. He'll play the slot, he'll play on the outside. My guess is he'll only be inline when it's an obvious pass play

He's a decent blocker as a TE2, which is intended as a chip blocker. Hes a receiver, and a massive upgrade.

Seattle lost the Super Bowl because they couldn't trust their #3 WR. Now they can
 

footballplaya52

Solo Dolo
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
12,623
Reaction score
614
bosoxlover12 said:
Gronk's hands are overstated fwiw


But Graham will be PERFECTLY fine in Seattle. He isn't replacing Willson, he's replacing Lockette. He'll play the slot, he'll play on the outside. My guess is he'll only be inline when it's an obvious pass play

He's a decent blocker as a TE2, which is intended as a chip blocker. Hes a receiver, and a massive upgrade.

Seattle lost the Super Bowl because they couldn't trust their #3 WR. Now they can
 
I'd argue they lost because they didnt trust the best runningback in the game lol
 

bosoxlover12

We're Onto Cincinnati
ADMIN
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
36,768
Reaction score
1,153
It was a good play. I don't care how good Marshawn is: down 4 with 40 seconds left, you don't run the ball when you have a poor run blocking TE as the only additional blocker, going against 8.

An 8 on 6 is a gigantic advantage to New England, and that's why Seattle threw it. But if Lockette went up strong, he would have gotten it. But he didn't, and it allowed Butler to get his body in there, and he picked it.

He can't do that if its Graham, or Kearse.
 

footballplaya52

Solo Dolo
Joined
Apr 19, 2009
Messages
12,623
Reaction score
614
bosoxlover12 said:
It was a good play. I don't care how good Marshawn is: down 4 with 40 seconds left, you don't run the ball when you have a poor run blocking TE as the only additional blocker, going against 8.

An 8 on 6 is a gigantic advantage to New England, and that's why Seattle threw it. But if Lockette went up strong, he would have gotten it. But he didn't, and it allowed Butler to get his body in there, and he picked it.

He can't do that if its Graham, or Kearse.
 
I understand why they did it but still. why not go to matthews who has the size and had been producing in the SB.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top