ERA or WHIP?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rios15

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
21,759
Reaction score
256
What do you personally measure a pitcher with more than the other in terms of ERA and WHIP? They're both pretty valid statistics after all -- but which one do you give more credit?
 

Elite

PND SZN
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
18,915
Reaction score
1,162
Both together. A high ERA but a low whip means they' probably pitched better than their ERA indicates and vice versa.
 

Rios15

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
21,759
Reaction score
256
Both together. A high ERA but a low whip means they' probably pitched better than their ERA indicates and vice versa.
They kind of correlate with each other most of the time but my argument is that a lower WHIP usually = a lower ERA and that's why I rank WHIP higher. You're allowing less batters on base which can in turn mean less runs looking at the big picture at least.
 

Sabbath

New Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
4,741
Reaction score
3
ERA because some pitchers are good at pitching out of jams. Regardless, they usually correlate to each other and the correction is usually eventually made at some point in the season, however Randy Wells rookie campaign springs to mind.
 

Mexi

#2 SG of all time #13
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
59,823
Reaction score
582
ERA is pretty misleading
 

elcheato

Well-Known Member
Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
67,842
Reaction score
2,208
Both are flawed and like someone mentioned above, they work well together to sniff out over and underachievers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Who Wins Game 5?

  • Tampa Bay Rays (Away)

    Votes: 5 33.3%
  • Houston Astros (Home)

    Votes: 10 66.7%
Top